Close X
Saturday, November 16, 2024
ADVT 
National

Victims Of Danforth Shooting File Class-Action Lawsuit Against US Gunmaker Smith & Wesson

Darpan News Desk, 17 Dec, 2019 07:11 PM
  • Victims Of Danforth Shooting File Class-Action Lawsuit Against US Gunmaker Smith & Wesson

TORONTO - Victims of a mass shooting in Toronto have filed a class-action lawsuit against U.S. gunmaker Smith & Wesson, alleging the company was negligent for failing to include "smart gun" techology in the handgun that was used in the attack.

 

A statement of claim filed in Ontario Superior Court on behalf of several victims of the shooting on Toronto's Danforth Ave. in July 2018 alleges Smith & Wesson was aware the semi-automatic pistol, which was previously reported stolen from a Saskatchewan dealer, was "ultra hazardous."

 

It alleges the company was aware guns without systems to prohibit their use by people other than their authorized owners posed a likelihood of harm to the public because it made an agreement with the US government in 2000 to incorporate the technology into new gun designs, but then introduced the type of gun used in the attack in 2005.

 

The statement of claim contains allegations which have not yet been tested in court.

 

Smith & Wesson did not immediately respond when asked for comment by The Canadian Press.

 

The shooting in July 2018 left two dead and 13 injured. The shooter killed himself.

 

"It was reasonably foreseeable that the Defendant's handgun products, like the handgun used in the Danforth Shooting, would in the hands of unauthorized users cause substantial harm to, or kill, innocent third parties," the statement of claim says.

 

"Statistics published by Canadian and United States authorities show a high rate of illegal handgun diversion and use of illegally diverted handguns to harm innocent third parties like Class members."

 

The statement notes that while U.S. Congress passed legislation in 2005 that shields gun manufacturers and sellers from litigation resulting from unlawful or unauthorized misuse of a firearm, it says Canada has no such laws.

 

It says it will ask the court to certify three classes for the action: those shot and injured, or killed; other injured; and family members.

 

The claim seeks $50 million in general damages and $100 million in punitive damages.

 

MORE National ARTICLES

Closing Arguments Begin In Legal Case Over Private Health Care In B.C.

Closing Arguments Begin In Legal Case Over Private Health Care In B.C.
Peter Gall began his closing arguments Monday in a decade-long constitutional challenge of the Medicare Protection Act of B.C. as lead plaintiff Dr. Brian Day, CEO of Cambie Surgical Corp., looked on from the gallery.

Closing Arguments Begin In Legal Case Over Private Health Care In B.C.

Two Hurt, Four Others Rescued, As Flames Damage Vancouver Apartment Building

VANCOUVER - Firefighters had to work quickly to rescue six residents of a burning apartment building in south Vancouver.

Two Hurt, Four Others Rescued, As Flames Damage Vancouver Apartment Building

Trans Mountain Received $320M In Government Subsidies In First Half 2019: Report

The money included $135.8 million in direct subsidies and $183.8 million in indirect subsidies that were not clearly disclosed to taxpayers, says the report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.    

Trans Mountain Received $320M In Government Subsidies In First Half 2019: Report

B.C. Introduces Gas Price Transparency Law Forcing Companies To Reveal Data

It's time to reveal to drivers in British Columbia how the price of gasoline is set, says provincial cabinet minister Bruce Ralston.

B.C. Introduces Gas Price Transparency Law Forcing Companies To Reveal Data

Police Release Sketch Of Suspect Wanted In Brampton Sex Assault

Investigators from the Peel Regional Police Special Victims Unit are continuing to seek the public’s assistance in relation to a sexual assault investigation in the City of Brampton.

Police Release Sketch Of Suspect Wanted In Brampton Sex Assault

Are You A Taxi Driver? If You Are, It’s Time To Start Buckling Up.

Taxi drivers used to be exempt from wearing seatbelts under Section 32.02 of the Motor Vehicle Act, as long as they remained under 70km/h. 

Are You A Taxi Driver? If You Are, It’s Time To Start Buckling Up.