Close X
Friday, November 29, 2024
ADVT 
National

Supreme Court Tells Judges To Take Care, Be Clear On Use Of 'Rape-shield' Law

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 28 Jun, 2019 11:57 PM
  • Supreme Court Tells Judges To Take Care, Be Clear On Use Of 'Rape-shield' Law

OTTAWA — Canada's top court has issued a stern warning about allowing evidence of past sexual history in sex-assault trials, telling judges to be strict with jurors on how such details can be used.


The warning from the Supreme Court of Canada on Friday arose out of an Alberta case where a jury heard about a "friends-with-benefits" relationship between an accused and an alleged sexual-assault victim, meaning they were friends who, from time to time, got together to have sex.


A complainant's sexual history can't ordinarily be raised as evidence unless it's directly relevant to the charge.


The trial judge allowed the information over concerns that jurors would have thought the relationship was platonic, calling the evidence "relatively benign."


The majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal disagreed and ordered a new trial for Patrick John Goldfinch — a ruling the Supreme Court upheld Friday.


In a 6-1 decision, the court said the evidence was used only to suggest that the alleged victim was likely to have consented to sex with Goldfinch because she had consented in the past, which is exactly what the "rape-shield" law is meant to prevent.


"This case serves as a powerful illustration of how a trial can go off the rails where sexual activity evidence is admitted without being anchored to a specific, legitimate purpose," Justice Michael Moldaver wrote in one of two sets of reasons that reached the same conclusion. The judge and lawyers on both sides have to be "crystal clear" about what evidence is being allowed and why, and talk about it only for that purpose.


"Without this anchor, the trial may drift into unsafe waters, as occurred in this case."


Goldfinch was charged in 2014 with assaulting a woman he had once lived with, but was acquitted by a jury. During his 2017 trial, the judge twice told the jury that they had to take a limited view of the "friends-with-benefits" information, which Goldfinch said was necessary context for his account of events.


Before 1982, there were no limits on the defence's ability to introduce information about past sexual activity, usually done to attack the victim's credibility. The "rape-shield" provisions have since spelled out that evidence can only be introduced about specific instances and must be relevant to the issues at trial.


Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, writing for the largest group of judges, said Goldfinch couldn't point to any specific use for his sexual past with the woman. The evidence served no purpose other than to imply that because she had consented to sex in the past, she was more likely to have consented on the night in question.


"No means no, and only yes means yes: even in the context of an established relationship, even part way through a sexual encounter, and even if the act is one the complainant has routinely consented to in the past," she wrote, and judges in sexual-assault cases who do allow such evidence to be introduced should remind jurors of that if they have any concern that a jury will use it improperly.


Karakatsanis warned that "even 'relatively benign' relationship evidence must be scrutinized and handled with care."


The lone dissenting judge, Justice Russell Brown, argued the issues at trial were the result of the Crown's straying beyond the limits the trial judge put on the relationship details.


Brown said the evidence was no different than if an accused and complainant were married or dating.


"Making full answer and defence (to criminal charges) includes being allowed to tell a story that is complete and coherent by drawing from relevant evidence whose probative value outweighs its prejudicial effects," Brown wrote.


"This cannot be achieved by confining accused persons to saying what happened and not allowing them to explain how, or why, or to produce any corroborating evidence."

MORE National ARTICLES

Canadian Cities Set Up 'Jurassic Parks' For Fans To Watch Raptors Playoff Run

Canadian Cities Set Up 'Jurassic Parks' For Fans To Watch Raptors Playoff Run
Several Canadian cities say they're setting up public spaces where fans caught up in Raptors fever can watch the Toronto team fight for the NBA championship.    

Canadian Cities Set Up 'Jurassic Parks' For Fans To Watch Raptors Playoff Run

Health Canada Suspends Biocell Breast Implants Citing Increased Cancer Risks

Health Canada Suspends Biocell Breast Implants Citing Increased Cancer Risks
Health Canada has suspended the licences for Biocell breast implants because of an increased cancer risk.

Health Canada Suspends Biocell Breast Implants Citing Increased Cancer Risks

Former Mountie Says 'Humiliating' That Sex Assault Probes Against Doctor Dropped

Former Mountie Says 'Humiliating' That Sex Assault Probes Against Doctor Dropped
HALIFAX — A former Mountie who filed a complaint against a physician who performed medical exams on recruits says it was humiliating to learn no charges would be laid against him after allegations of sexual assault.    

Former Mountie Says 'Humiliating' That Sex Assault Probes Against Doctor Dropped

China's Ambassador Makes Second Trip To Nova Scotia, Calls Premier Stephen Mcneil ‘Great Friend’

HALIFAX — Just days after saying Canada's ties with China have hit "rock bottom", China's ambassador is praising Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil as "a great friend."

China's Ambassador Makes Second Trip To Nova Scotia, Calls Premier Stephen Mcneil ‘Great Friend’

Union Says Port Workers Still On The Job In B.C., Despite Lockout Notice

Automation is a key sticking point in negotiations and Scott said improved automation will protect jobs.

Union Says Port Workers Still On The Job In B.C., Despite Lockout Notice

Bulk Of Federal Clean-Energy Investments Go To Remote Haida Gwaii In B.C.

VANCOUVER — The federal government has announced over $15 million in funding for clean energy projects, with most of the money going to the remote island of Haida Gwaii on British Columbia's west coast.    

Bulk Of Federal Clean-Energy Investments Go To Remote Haida Gwaii In B.C.