Close X
Sunday, November 10, 2024
ADVT 
National

Supreme Court Tells Judges To Take Care, Be Clear On Use Of 'Rape-shield' Law

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 28 Jun, 2019 11:57 PM
  • Supreme Court Tells Judges To Take Care, Be Clear On Use Of 'Rape-shield' Law

OTTAWA — Canada's top court has issued a stern warning about allowing evidence of past sexual history in sex-assault trials, telling judges to be strict with jurors on how such details can be used.


The warning from the Supreme Court of Canada on Friday arose out of an Alberta case where a jury heard about a "friends-with-benefits" relationship between an accused and an alleged sexual-assault victim, meaning they were friends who, from time to time, got together to have sex.


A complainant's sexual history can't ordinarily be raised as evidence unless it's directly relevant to the charge.


The trial judge allowed the information over concerns that jurors would have thought the relationship was platonic, calling the evidence "relatively benign."


The majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal disagreed and ordered a new trial for Patrick John Goldfinch — a ruling the Supreme Court upheld Friday.


In a 6-1 decision, the court said the evidence was used only to suggest that the alleged victim was likely to have consented to sex with Goldfinch because she had consented in the past, which is exactly what the "rape-shield" law is meant to prevent.


"This case serves as a powerful illustration of how a trial can go off the rails where sexual activity evidence is admitted without being anchored to a specific, legitimate purpose," Justice Michael Moldaver wrote in one of two sets of reasons that reached the same conclusion. The judge and lawyers on both sides have to be "crystal clear" about what evidence is being allowed and why, and talk about it only for that purpose.


"Without this anchor, the trial may drift into unsafe waters, as occurred in this case."


Goldfinch was charged in 2014 with assaulting a woman he had once lived with, but was acquitted by a jury. During his 2017 trial, the judge twice told the jury that they had to take a limited view of the "friends-with-benefits" information, which Goldfinch said was necessary context for his account of events.


Before 1982, there were no limits on the defence's ability to introduce information about past sexual activity, usually done to attack the victim's credibility. The "rape-shield" provisions have since spelled out that evidence can only be introduced about specific instances and must be relevant to the issues at trial.


Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, writing for the largest group of judges, said Goldfinch couldn't point to any specific use for his sexual past with the woman. The evidence served no purpose other than to imply that because she had consented to sex in the past, she was more likely to have consented on the night in question.


"No means no, and only yes means yes: even in the context of an established relationship, even part way through a sexual encounter, and even if the act is one the complainant has routinely consented to in the past," she wrote, and judges in sexual-assault cases who do allow such evidence to be introduced should remind jurors of that if they have any concern that a jury will use it improperly.


Karakatsanis warned that "even 'relatively benign' relationship evidence must be scrutinized and handled with care."


The lone dissenting judge, Justice Russell Brown, argued the issues at trial were the result of the Crown's straying beyond the limits the trial judge put on the relationship details.


Brown said the evidence was no different than if an accused and complainant were married or dating.


"Making full answer and defence (to criminal charges) includes being allowed to tell a story that is complete and coherent by drawing from relevant evidence whose probative value outweighs its prejudicial effects," Brown wrote.


"This cannot be achieved by confining accused persons to saying what happened and not allowing them to explain how, or why, or to produce any corroborating evidence."

MORE National ARTICLES

First Nations Push For Massive Conservation Area In Northern British Columbia

First Nations Push For Massive Conservation Area In Northern British Columbia
The proposal would cover the ancestral areas of three Kaska Dena First Nations and would be larger than Vancouver Island, taking up a massive section of north-central B.C.

First Nations Push For Massive Conservation Area In Northern British Columbia

3 South Asian Suspects Wanted After Teen Assaulted In The Middle Of Traffic In Surrey

Surrey RCMP is advising the public of an assault investigation and requesting their assistance to identify three suspects.

3 South Asian Suspects Wanted After Teen Assaulted In The Middle Of Traffic In Surrey

Ontario Court Upholds Ruling To Allow Sexual Activity Evidence In Boyle Case

Boyle, 35, has pleaded not guilty in the Ontario Court of Justice to offences against Caitlan Coleman, 33, including assault, sexual assault and unlawful confinement.

Ontario Court Upholds Ruling To Allow Sexual Activity Evidence In Boyle Case

Liberals Prepare To Spend $50M On Social-Finance Plan, But No Strategy For Now

The Liberals are taking their first $50-million step in a plan to finance experimental ways to deliver social services.

Liberals Prepare To Spend $50M On Social-Finance Plan, But No Strategy For Now

Trudeau Appoints Jacqueline O’Neill As Canada’s First Ambassador For Women, Peace And Security

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has appointed Canada's first ambassador for women, peace and security.

Trudeau Appoints Jacqueline O’Neill As Canada’s First Ambassador For Women, Peace And Security

Free Transit OK'd For Youth Living In Victoria, Starts In September

The Victoria Regional Transit Commission unanimously approved a plan by the municipality to provide free bus passes to students who live in the city and are 18 years old or under.

Free Transit OK'd For Youth Living In Victoria, Starts In September