Close X
Wednesday, November 27, 2024
ADVT 
National

Court rejects appeal of Stampeder's killer

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 30 Sep, 2020 06:44 PM
  • Court rejects appeal of Stampeder's killer

Alberta's top court has upheld the conviction of a man who killed a Calgary Stampeders football player outside a nightclub in 2016.

Three Court of Appeal justices unanimously dismissed the appeal of Nelson Lugela, who was found guilty last year of second-degree murder in the death of Mylan Hicks.

"The appellant has failed to satisfy us that there is any basis to interfere with the trial judge's conviction," the judges wrote in their decision released Wednesday.

Hicks, a 23-year-old player on the practice roster of the Canadian Football League team, was shot twice outside the Marquee Beer Market, where he and his teammates were celebrating a win over the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.

The trial heard a disagreement over a spilled drink in the bar intensified in a parking lot after closing time.

Witnesses testified that after some pushing and shoving, a person who appeared to be holding a handgun opened fire at Hicks as he was running for cover.

Several witnesses identified Lugela as the man holding the gun.

Hicks was shot in the abdomen and chest and died in hospital.

He was from Detroit, and family members have said they believed he was safer from gun violence while playing football in Canada.

Lugela argued in his appeal that the trial judge erred by allowing social media photographs showing he had access to a handgun that looked like one police retrieved after the shooting. Lugela argued the pictures constituted "bad character evidence."

"In our view, these photos were properly admitted as they were logically relevant to the issue of identity," the Appeal Court justices wrote.

"These were not photos showing Mr. Lugela with random weapons. They were a series of photos suggesting he possessed the exact type of handgun used in the shooting."

Lugela also argued that the trial judge failed to test the admissibility of witness statements identifying him as the shooter, misapplied the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and gave an unreasonable verdict.

Lugela is also appealing his life sentence with no chance of parole for 18 years.

MORE National ARTICLES

Church seeks leave to appeal Mount Cashel ruling

Church seeks leave to appeal Mount Cashel ruling
The archdiocese says in a release that its lawyers today petitioned for leave to appeal the July decision from the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal.

Church seeks leave to appeal Mount Cashel ruling

Daily new COVID-19 cases triple in past month

Daily new COVID-19 cases triple in past month
Canada's chief public health officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, said the country had seen an average of more than 1,100 new cases of the novel coronavirus a day this past week compared with about 380 a day in mid-August.

Daily new COVID-19 cases triple in past month

Mask-wearing often optional for Canadian cops

Mask-wearing often optional for Canadian cops
Capstick, a former political commentator, said he regularly sees police officers in his neighbourhood not wearing masks when standing close to each other and to members of the public.

Mask-wearing often optional for Canadian cops

Post-tropical storm Teddy hits N.S. coastline

Post-tropical storm Teddy hits N.S. coastline
Schools were closed, public transit in Halifax was suspended until noon and many flights were cancelled, but Teddy didn't leave much of a mark on the province.

Post-tropical storm Teddy hits N.S. coastline

Raymond said killings 'not my fault': witness

Raymond said killings 'not my fault': witness
On Sept. 15 when the trial opened, lawyers for Raymond acknowledged their client shot and killed the four people but said he is not criminally responsible because of a mental disorder.

Raymond said killings 'not my fault': witness

Supreme Court reserves judgment on carbon tax

Supreme Court reserves judgment on carbon tax
After two days of hearings and presentations from more than two dozen interested parties, the court adjourned without yet deciding whether the carbon price is constitutional.

Supreme Court reserves judgment on carbon tax