Close X
Friday, November 15, 2024
ADVT 
National

Class-action Against Government 'Biggest Battle' Of His Life: Disabled War Vet

The Canadian Press , 04 Dec, 2014 12:48 PM
    VANCOUVER — Major Mark Campbell was lying in a hospital bed, just starting to comprehend losing both his legs above the knees in a Taliban ambush, when he found out the federal government had stripped his lifetime military pension.
     
    "I expected to just move off into the twilight and retire, but unfortunately it's just like the clichè out of a Hollywood movie," said the Edmonton man, describing the conclusion to 33-years of service after a final tour in Afghanistan.
     
    "I come home and I find that, honestly, the biggest battle I've ever faced in my entire life is here at home against my very own government."
     
    Campbell, 49, is one of seven plaintiffs attempting to sue the federal government for drastic alterations to the Canadian Forces compensation regime, which applies to the newer generation of armed forces members injured in the line of service after 2006.
     
    Federal government lawyers were in British Columbia's highest court on Wednesday, launching their appeal of a lower court's approval of a class-action lawsuit in September 2013 by the soldiers disabled in Afghanistan.
     
    The Attorney General of Canada wants the legal action tossed out, even as the veterans join a growing clamour surrounding claims of unfair treatment of retired military personnel across the country.
     
    Campbell, who also lost a testicle, ruptured his eardrum and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, said he has been stripped of benefits amounting to about $35,000 — a plight he would have avoided if not for accepting a second call to duty in Afghanistan. His lower body was decimated by the blast of an improvised explosive device while his team rescued another injured Canadian.
     
    He flew to Vancouver to watch the two-day court proceedings that he considers to be the government's attempt to save dollars "on the backs of current-day veterans." He guessed it could take 10 years to see the case finished.
     
    "Canada bred us as warriors. To think that we're just going to fold and buckle under a bit of government pressure is ridiculous," he said outside court. "We're going to fight this thing to the bitter end."
     
    The lawsuit was filed in fall 2012 by the group that claims the New Veterans Charter is unconstitutional and violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was approved by a unanimous vote of Parliament in 2006 and amended in 2011 as a result of public outcry.
     
    Current and former Canadian Forces members are appalled that the lifetime disability pension for disabled soldiers has been replaced by lump-sum payments.
     
    Inside court, government lawyer Paul Vickery told a three-judge panel the appeal was necessary because the soldiers' claims could negatively impact fundamental democratic principles.
     
    He told court that while the government readily acknowledges the great value and sacrifice of the soldiers, Parliament is the "only appropriate forum" for resolving the claims made in the lawsuit.
     
    "The appeal which the attorney general brings before you is not brought out of any lack of appreciation of those services," Vickery said.
     
    A second federal lawyer then attacked the plaintiffs' main argument that they deserve benefits in line with the previous regime, the Pension Act, based on historical promises. He did not dispute that the new scheme is "less generous."
     
    Travis Henderson contested that repeated pledges by governments over the 20th century, stemming from a speech made in 1917 by then-prime minister Robert Borden, amounted to a special legal obligation to care for soldiers.
     
    He said that while the vow of a "social covenant" suggests a duty is owed based on the "honour of the Crown," it is a legal principle that only applies in the context of aboriginal law.
     
    "I would submit to this court that in no way can a political speech be equated to written constitutional principles," he added.
     
    Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino wouldn't provide comment, but a spokeswoman said the case "deals with something that all parties agreed to under the previous government."
     
    A ruling by the panel can still be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada before any of its claims are tested in court.

    MORE National ARTICLES

    First CF-18 operational missions over Iraq completed, defence sources

    First CF-18 operational missions over Iraq completed, defence sources
    KUWAIT CITY — Two Canadian CF-18 fighters conducted the country's first combat mission over Iraq, but bad weather west of Baghdad prevented them from striking any Islamic State targets, the task force commander said Friday.

    First CF-18 operational missions over Iraq completed, defence sources

    Man dies at scene after overnight shooting involving police in Calgary

    Man dies at scene after overnight shooting involving police in Calgary
    CALGARY — A man is dead after a police-involved shooting at a Calgary facility that offers low-cost supportive housing for men with mental health and addiction issues.

    Man dies at scene after overnight shooting involving police in Calgary

    Lawyer for former archbishop making case to Manitoba Court of Appeal

    Lawyer for former archbishop making case to Manitoba Court of Appeal
    WINNIPEG — A former archbishop convicted of sexually assaulting an altar boy in the 1980s is appealing his case to Manitoba's highest court today.

    Lawyer for former archbishop making case to Manitoba Court of Appeal

    Judge convicts MP Dean Del Mastro on campaign overspending charges

    Judge convicts MP Dean Del Mastro on campaign overspending charges
    LINDSAY, Ont. — Former Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro, once a political pitbull who defended his party from partisan claims of dirty electoral tricks, has been found guilty of exceeding spending limits during the federal campaign in 2008.

    Judge convicts MP Dean Del Mastro on campaign overspending charges

    Lawyers fight over who should be allowed to witness infant autopsies in Winnipeg

    Lawyers fight over who should be allowed to witness infant autopsies in Winnipeg
    WINNIPEG — A court battle is underway over how autopsies on the bodies of six Manitoba infants should be conducted.

    Lawyers fight over who should be allowed to witness infant autopsies in Winnipeg

    Perjury trial begins for BC Mountie involved in Dziekanski's Airport Taser Death

    Perjury trial begins for BC Mountie involved in Dziekanski's Airport Taser Death
    VANCOUVER — A former RCMP officer's perjury trial heard allegations Thursday that the four Mounties involved in Robert Dziekanski's death gathered for a private meeting in the weeks before testifying at a public inquiry.

    Perjury trial begins for BC Mountie involved in Dziekanski's Airport Taser Death