Close X
Thursday, December 12, 2024
ADVT 
International

Apple: FBI Seeks 'Dangerous Power' In Fight Over Phone

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 26 Feb, 2016 11:34 AM
    WASHINGTON — In its first salvo in a court fight that pits digital privacy rights against national security, Apple Inc. asked a federal magistrate to reverse her order forcing the company to help the FBI hack into a locked iPhone.
     
    The Thursday filing — a day before its formal objection was due and as FBI Director James Comey defended the FBI stance on Capitol Hill — accused the federal government of seeking "dangerous power" through the courts and of trampling on the Cupertino-based company's constitutional rights.
     
    The arguments by Apple attorneys, outlined a day before the company's annual shareholders meeting scheduled for Friday, built upon those voiced by the company's chief executive and supporters in the last week and set the stage for a prolonged fight with legal arguments that may take the issue as far as the Supreme Court.
     
    The Justice Department is proposing an unprecedented and "boundless interpretation" of the law that, if left unchecked, could bring disastrous repercussions, the company warned in a memo submitted to Magistrate Sheri Pym in California that aggressively challenges policy justifications put forward by the Obama administration.
     
    "The government says: 'Just this once' and 'Just this phone.' But the government knows those statements are not true," lawyers for Apple wrote.
     
    The locked iPhone 5C in question was a work phone linked to Syed Farook, who with his wife Tashfeen Malik, killed 14 people in a Dec. 2 terror attack in San Bernardino, California, which was at least partly inspired by the Islamic State group. Two personal cellphones were found so badly destroyed that investigators couldn't retrieve data from them.
     
    Justice Department lawyers were reviewing Apple's brief and will respond, said spokeswoman Melanie Newman. She said Apple had reversed "its long-standing" co-operation with government requests, and that when Justice Department officials want to search a phone or another electronic device, "we narrowly target our request to apply to the individual device" and get a judge's approval.
     
     
    The court fight is set on new ground that could create meaningful precedent and establish new legal boundaries on how technology is dealt with in the national security context when encrypted devices increasingly proliferate and so many of the overarching laws governing their use are antiquated.
     
    Over the last year, law enforcement officials have spoken out about their inability to access encrypted data. In the California case, the phone was found after investigators searched a car with a warrant after the attack and then couldn't access the locked iPhone, despite working with Apple and Farook's employer.
     
    Comey reiterated to lawmakers Thursday that the government owed it to victims' families to conduct a thorough investigation. Some family members and survivors of the attack have said they'll be filing a brief in support of the government's position.
     
    Pym directed Apple to help the FBI hack its phone by creating specialized software that will let investigators bypass time-delay and self-destruct security protocols so that it can repeatedly and quickly test passcodes in what's known as a brute force attack without risking loss of the phone's data after 10 tries.
     
    In court papers, Apple derisively called the specialized software the FBI requested "GovtOS," a play off the formal name for its iOS operating software for iPhones and tablets.
     
    Apple, which must convince Pym that the order is an "unreasonable burden," argues that her order expands judicial power and is a political issue that Congress should decide. Apple's attorneys also say the legal order is a new expansion of the 1789 All Writs Act, which has been used to require third parties to help law enforcement in investigations. A federal magistrate in New York remains poised to rule on whether the catchall law has the power to force Apple to bypass security protocols on its behalf in a drug case.
     
    Apple states in its filing that creating the new software would require "significant resources and effort," forcing it to dedicate six to 10 engineers for up to four weeks in a new "hyper-secure isolation" room.
     
    The order would "effectively require Apple to create full-time positions in a new 'hacking' department to service government requests and to develop new versions of the back door software every time iOS changes" plus those engineers would likely have to testify as government witnesses in trials.
     
     
    Plus, "if the new operating system has to be destroyed and recreated each time a new order is issued, the burden will multiple," the filing states.
     
    Apple's attorneys said "there are hundreds of demands to create and utilize the software waiting in the wings," noting Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, who's said his office has 175 iPhones it can't open. Apple is opposing requests to help extract information from 14 Apple devices in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York.
     
    Should Apple not destroy the new operating system, it would have to protect it from "criminals, terrorists, and hackers" gunning for code to access material on millions of iPhones, the attorneys state.
     
    Apple compared forcing it to create software that doesn't exist to weaken the iPhone's locks to forcing a journalist to publish false information to arrest a fugitive or forcing another software company to implant a virus in a customer's computer so the government could eavesdrop. It argued that such a precedent could lead to many other potentially more invasive requests.
     
    Attorneys for Apple also argued that forcing Apple to use its cryptographic signature to validate the code so that Farook's iPhone would recognize and accept the new operating system would be "compelled speech and viewpoint discrimination" and violate the First Amendment. Prior court precedent has treated computer code as speech and Apple's attorneys say that the government is forcing Apple to speak on its behalf through code, adopting a security and privacy viewpoint the company does not support.
     
    The government's response is due by March 10. A hearing is scheduled for March 22.

    MORE International ARTICLES

    US Repeals Meat Labeling Law After Trade Rulings Against It; Consumers Won't Know Meat Origin

    US Repeals Meat Labeling Law After Trade Rulings Against It; Consumers Won't Know Meat Origin
    WASHINGTON — It's now harder to find out where your beef or pork was born, raised and slaughtered.

    US Repeals Meat Labeling Law After Trade Rulings Against It; Consumers Won't Know Meat Origin

    Proposed One-Metre Rule For Cars And Cyclists 'A Great Idea:' Manitoba Premier

    Proposed One-Metre Rule For Cars And Cyclists 'A Great Idea:' Manitoba Premier
    Selinger says a call to force drivers to move over at least one metre when passing a cyclist is "a great idea" that he would like to see become law.

    Proposed One-Metre Rule For Cars And Cyclists 'A Great Idea:' Manitoba Premier

    Indian Consulate In Afghanistan Attacked, Two Terrorists Killed

    Indian Consulate In Afghanistan Attacked, Two Terrorists Killed
    A group of armed men late Sunday attacked the Indian consulate in Mazar-e-Sharif, the capital of northern Balkh province, the provincial governor spokesperson told media.

    Indian Consulate In Afghanistan Attacked, Two Terrorists Killed

    In Conversations With Prominent Figures, Obama Tries To Reconnect Before Presidency Runs Out

    In Conversations With Prominent Figures, Obama Tries To Reconnect Before Presidency Runs Out
    President Barack Obama has held a series of "conversations" with figures in arts, letters and entertainment as the White House experiments with ways to reconnect Americans to the president before they say goodbye to him.

    In Conversations With Prominent Figures, Obama Tries To Reconnect Before Presidency Runs Out

    Saudi Beheadings Soar In 2015 To Highest In 2 Decades Under Discretionary Rulings By Judges

    Saudi Beheadings Soar In 2015 To Highest In 2 Decades Under Discretionary Rulings By Judges
    Coinciding with the rise in executions is the number of people executed for non-lethal offences that judges have wide discretion to rule on, particularly for drug-related crimes.

    Saudi Beheadings Soar In 2015 To Highest In 2 Decades Under Discretionary Rulings By Judges

    Universities Tap Into Growth In Craft Beer Industry By Offering Business Classes

    Universities Tap Into Growth In Craft Beer Industry By Offering Business Classes
    In the last decade, the number of craft breweries has grown to more than 4,000 in the U.S. today, from more than 1,400 in 2005, according to the Brewers Association.

    Universities Tap Into Growth In Craft Beer Industry By Offering Business Classes