Close X
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
ADVT 
India

Sadhvi Pragnya, Five Accused Let Off In Malegaon Terror Blast

The Canadian Press, 13 May, 2016 11:01 AM
    In a complete about turn, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Friday gave a clean chit to Malegaon blast key accused Sadhvi Pragnya Singh Thakur and five others, paving the way for their early release from prison.
     
    However, eight more accused, including LT. Colonel Prasad Srikant Purohit, will continue to be prosecuted for their role in the September 29, 2008 terror bombing that claimed at least seven lives in the Muslim majority town of Maharashtra's Nashik district.
     
    The NIA in its supplementary charge-sheet filed before a special court here decided to drop terror charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against all the accused, an official said. Confessions made before a police officer are admissible in a court under the dreaded law.
     
    Those who remain accused will now be prosecuted under the lesser stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, or UAPA, for their role in the bombing that had brought to fore the so-called "right-wing terror" in India. Most of the accused in such terror cases were linked to Hindutva groups, including the Rashtriya Jagran Manch and Abhinav Bharat.
     
    The accused given clean chit on Friday include the Sadhvi, Shiv Narain Kalsangra, Shyam Bhavarlal Sahu, Pravin Takkalki alias Mutalik, Lokesh Sharma and Dhan Singh Choudhury.
     
    "During investigations, sufficient evidences have not been found against (the accused) and the NIA has submitted in the final report that the prosecution against them is not maintainable," the NIA said, after public prosecutor Geeta Godambe filed the charge sheet in the court of Special Judge S.D. Tekale.
     
    The premier terror probe agency said no offence was established under the MCOCA in this case against anybody and the NIA made it clear that it didn't not rely on the confessionals recorded by the Mumbai Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) under the law.
     
    The Sadhvi's lawyer Sanjiv Punalekar told IANS that the NIA had decided to drop charges against his client due to lack of sufficient evidences against her.
     
    "The charges against the six accused have been dropped while the charge sheet is being filed against the other remaining accused," Punalekar told IANS.
     
    The six accused are likely to be released from prisons soon, he told reporters.
     
    The Malegaon 2008 blast was the first terror case involving the hitherto unknown "Hindu extremists" and was initially investigated by police and later by the ATS led by its chief Hemant Karkare, who was killed in the November 26-28, 2008, Mumbai terror attacks.
     
    In April 2011, the case went to the NIA which was formed in 2009, months after the Mumbai carnage. The NIA earlier had maintained the list of 14 accused named by the ATS. Two more - Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sadeep Dange - had been declared absconding.
     
    The NIA took charge of the Malegaon case in view of its nationwide ramifications and because of the involvement of the accused who were also wanted in other terror cases in different parts of the country.
     
    The Malegaon blast case probe had riled the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and other right-wing groups, accusing the then Congress-led government of giving religious colour to terrorism by going after Hindutva activists without any evidence against them.
     
    On Friday when the charges against the main accused were dropped, the Congress' Digvijaya Singh hit out at the NIA and the BJP-led government for safeguarding "terrorists". He also lashed out at the NIA for invalidating Hemant Karkare's probe. 
     
    "They are saying that Karkare filed a wrong report. We know you want to safeguard them (the accused) and we also know you have links with those who are involved in terror activities. They should at least spare a martyr," Digvijay Singh said. 
     
    But the government denied there was any political interference in probe. 
     
    Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju said: "The law is taking its natural course. The investigators now have the freedom to investigate without pressure unlike during the previous regime."

    MORE India ARTICLES

    Comply With Order To Demolish Chandni Chowk Gurdwara Sis Ganj 'Piao': Delhi High Court

    Comply With Order To Demolish Chandni Chowk Gurdwara  Sis Ganj 'Piao': Delhi High Court
    A division bench of Justice S. Murlidhar and Justice Vibhu Bakhru expressed strong displeasure on reconstruction of 'piao' despite the court's order. 

    Comply With Order To Demolish Chandni Chowk Gurdwara Sis Ganj 'Piao': Delhi High Court

    Punjab Seeks Fresh Tribunal To Relook At Water Sharing Arrangements

    Punjab Seeks Fresh Tribunal To Relook At Water Sharing Arrangements
    Punjab on Friday urged the Supreme Court to refuse to answer the Presidential reference on the validity of the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004, saying it was not obligated to go into it.

    Punjab Seeks Fresh Tribunal To Relook At Water Sharing Arrangements

    Watch: Breaking 400-Year-Old Tradition, Women Worship At Maharashtra Shani Temple

    A group of women on Friday created history when they prayed at the well known Shani Shingnapur temple here by pouring oil on the five-feet tall idol of Lord Shanidev.

    Watch: Breaking 400-Year-Old Tradition, Women Worship At Maharashtra Shani Temple

    'Hard Evidence On Pathankot Forced Pakistan's Turnaround'

    Sources maintained that the "hard evidence" tabled by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to the visiting Joint Investigating Team (JIT) during their five-day stay in India has left then "surprised".

    'Hard Evidence On Pathankot Forced Pakistan's Turnaround'

    Arrest Me If You So Wish: Mamata Dares Modi

    Arrest Me If You So Wish: Mamata Dares Modi
    I fight with my head held high. I never bow my head before anyone. The prime minister can arrest me if he so wishes, I don't care

    Arrest Me If You So Wish: Mamata Dares Modi

    'Abdul Basit's Statement Another Example Of Pakistan's Double Dealing'

    Was Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit speaking at variance with the official line on relations with India when he said that the bilateral "peace process is suspended", or was it said deliberately with the permission of Islamabad?

    'Abdul Basit's Statement Another Example Of Pakistan's Double Dealing'