Close X
Saturday, October 5, 2024
ADVT 
India

Not mandatory for private hospitals to treat poor for free: HC

Darpan News Desk IANS, 28 Apr, 2014 10:31 AM
    In a setback to poor patients, the Delhi High Court Monday exempted city's four big private hospitals from the "mandatory obligation" to provide free treatment to certain percentage of poor patients.
     
    Saying such mandatory requirement was "not provided in their lease deed", a division bench of Justice S.Ravindra Bhat and Justice R.V.Easwar allowed the pleas of the hospitals challenging the central government's order of incorporating a condition inserted in its lease deed for free treatment to the poor.
     
    The government had mandatory for private hospitals, built on land allocated by the government on concessional rates, to provide 10 percent treatment to poor people in the patient department (IPD) and 25 percent in the out patient department (OPD).
     
    The bench order came on a bunch of petitions filed by four hospitals - Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust, St.Stephen's Hospital, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science & Research and Foundation for Applied Research in Cancer - challenging the central government's order on the ground that it was not part of the conditions of lease deeds.
     
    The central government had contended that providing treatment to the poor was one of the clause in the lease deed due to which land was given to hospitals at a very cheap price.
     
    In its judgment, the court said: "What the government is seeking to achieve is untenable," adding that "neither the allotment nor the lease deed contained any requirement to provide free medical facilities" and submission of the central Delhi government that they had the power to issue direction in the regard are "untenable".

    MORE India ARTICLES

    TIME 100 list of the most influential people: Modi gets more NO votes than Justin Bieber

    TIME 100 list of the most influential people: Modi gets more NO votes than Justin Bieber
    BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi had many more “NO” votes than Canadian pop singer Justin Bieber and polled far fewer popular votes than AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal in a TIME 100 list of the most influential people in the world live poll as of late Sunday.

    TIME 100 list of the most influential people: Modi gets more NO votes than Justin Bieber

    India's democracy reaches out to lone voter in Gir forest

    India's democracy reaches out to lone voter in Gir forest
    He remains one of India's most prized voters. Mahant Bharatdas Darshandas is the lone voter in the midst of Gujarat's Gir forest, home to the Asiatic lion, for whom an entire election team sets up a polling booth every election - and will do so again on April 30.

    India's democracy reaches out to lone voter in Gir forest

    Remove 'mother-son' regime, urges Modi

    Remove 'mother-son' regime, urges Modi
    BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi Sunday hit out at the Congress-led UPA, terming it a "maa betey ki sarkar" (a mother-son government) and urged people to vote them out.

    Remove 'mother-son' regime, urges Modi

    Modi is the flavour of Indian election coverage in US

    Modi is the flavour of Indian election coverage in US
    A CNN story on what it called "India's first social media election" also began with how during the Holi festival more than three million Twitter followers of Modi "received a personalised greeting from him."

    Modi is the flavour of Indian election coverage in US

    Caught On Camera: Baba Ramdev tries to hush BJP candidate about money

    Caught On Camera: Baba Ramdev tries to hush BJP candidate about money
    Baba Ramdev is facing major embarrassment due to a video clip which shows Yoga Guru in conversation with the BJP's Lok Sabha candidate in Alwar, Mahant Chandnath.

    Caught On Camera: Baba Ramdev tries to hush BJP candidate about money

    India: Non vegetarian majority with a vegetarian ruling class?

    India: Non vegetarian majority with a vegetarian ruling class?
    The Hindu newspaper, which has its main office in Chennai, has asked its employees not to bring non vegetarian food to the dining room because the smell offends vegetarian members of the staff. Is it an illiberal step? In the times we live, dietary restriction, or license, would be the wrong measure to gauge liberalism in a newspaper office. 

    India: Non vegetarian majority with a vegetarian ruling class?