Close X
Sunday, September 22, 2024
ADVT 
India

Mercedes Hit-and-Run: Delhi Minor To Be Tried As An Adult

Darpan News Desk IANS, 04 Jun, 2016 01:21 PM
    In the first prosecution under the amended Juvenile Justice Act, a minor accused in the Mercedes hit-and-run case in which a 33-year-old Delhi business consultant was killed in April this year will be tried as an adult.
     
    The Juvenile Justice board's order came while allowing the plea of Delhi Police seeking to try the offender - who was 17 at the time - as an adult, as the offence came under the definition of heinous crime.
     
    The juvenile had turned a major -- 18 years old -- just four days after the Mercedes he was driving at high-speed mowed down Siddharth Sharma in Civil Lines in North Delhi late on April 4 evening. 
     
    The juvenile would have been tried as a minor if the act had not been amended.
     
    The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Amendment Act, 2015 allows for juveniles 16 years or older to be tried as adults for heinous offences like rape and murder. The Act was amended following public outrage after one of the offenders in the December 16, 2012 gang rape case escaped being tried in the court as he was a few months short of turning 18.
     
    In this case, police, in its chargesheet filed on May 26, had charged the juvenile with culpable homicide not amounting to murder, which entails a maximum of 10 years in jail.
     
    According to sources, the juvenile board said that minor offender was able to understand the consequences of the offence on the date of incident and he was not lacking any mental and physical capacity to commit the alleged offence.
     
    "He drove very fast and dangerously despite warning of his friends, who were co-occupant of his car at the time of incident," the board said, adding that neither he helped the victim nor did he stop the car after causing the incident.
     
    The board observed that he fled from the spot to avoid getting caught for his misdeed.
     
    His conduct before and after the accident clearly reflect that he understood of the alleged offence against him, it said.
     
    The sources further added that the board, in its order, said: "The circumstances collectively indicate that he was indifferent towards life and safety of other users of the road but mature enough to think of ways to escape from lawful punishment of the offence."
     
     
    Police apprehended the minor on April 5, a day after he allegedly fatally knocked down Sharma, who was crossing the road to buy eatables.
     
    The minor was then freed on bail as he was booked under section 304-A (causing death by negligence) of the Indian Penal Code. Later police charged him with culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
     
    In the final investigation report, police charged the juvenile for offences under sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 279 (driving on a public way so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life) and 337 (causing hurt by an act which endangers human life).
     
    The juvenile's father was arrested under Section 304 (abetting culpable homicide not amounting to murder) of the IPC for letting his minor son drive despite knowing that he had caused an accident earlier. He was later released on bail.
     
    Police earlier told the court that CCTV footage showed that the teenager was driving his car at a high speed in a residential area.
     
    Police told the board that the teenager was a repeat offender and that he had a history of traffic violations which included over-speeding and he was booked for it on June 17, 2015.
     
    He was also booked for driving in violation of traffic regulations on February 25, 2014 and for not wearing a seat belt on September 19, 2014.
     
    On February 16, 2016, he was involved in a minor traffic accident at Maurice Nagar area in north Delhi, which was settled but he put a forged signature on the settlement papers to avoid detection, the police had said.

    MORE India ARTICLES

    '40 Percent People In India May Not Have Water To Drink By 2030'

    '40 Percent People In India May Not Have Water To Drink By 2030'
    Forty percent of India's population may not have drinking water by 2030, if the water crisis in country is not met seriously, a study has warned.

    '40 Percent People In India May Not Have Water To Drink By 2030'

    Those Who Did Nothing Spread Lies On Reservations: PM Modi

    Those Who Did Nothing Spread Lies On Reservations: PM Modi
    The Congress hit back, asking Modi as to who raked up the reservation issue in the first place and put the blame at the RSS' doorstep

    Those Who Did Nothing Spread Lies On Reservations: PM Modi

    OROP Payout Have Reached Over Two Third Pensioners: Manohar Parrikar

    OROP Payout Have Reached Over Two Third Pensioners:  Manohar Parrikar
    "The OROP pensions are being disbursed at a very fast speed. By February 17, two third of the pensioners were covered," Parrikar told reporters

    OROP Payout Have Reached Over Two Third Pensioners: Manohar Parrikar

    David Headley's Cross-examination Deferred To Wednesday

    David Headley's Cross-examination Deferred To Wednesday
    The cross-examination of Pakistani-American terrorist turned approver David Headley in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case, which was scheduled to start on Tuesday, has been postponed by a day, an official said on Monday.

    David Headley's Cross-examination Deferred To Wednesday

    For Political Convenience, Badal Changes Track On Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal

    For Political Convenience, Badal Changes Track On Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal
    Badal, who faces the next assembly polls in about 11 months, is now hell-bent on using the legislative route, even at the cost of defying the Supreme Court, to prevent the revival of the SYL canal and sharing water with Haryana

    For Political Convenience, Badal Changes Track On Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal

    Timing Of Son's Case Smacks Of Political Vendetta: Amarinder Singh

    Timing Of Son's Case Smacks Of Political Vendetta: Amarinder Singh
    Amarinder's son Raninder Singh was issued summons on Saturday by a Ludhiana court in a case filed by the income tax department for alleged non-disclosure of foreign bank accounts. 

    Timing Of Son's Case Smacks Of Political Vendetta: Amarinder Singh