Close X
Friday, January 10, 2025
ADVT 
India

1984: Delhi Court Issues Production Warrant Against Sajjan Kumar

Darpan News Desk IANS, 23 Jan, 2019 04:00 AM

    A Delhi court on Tuesday issued production warrant for January 28 against former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.


    District Judge Poonam A Bamba issued production warrant against Kumar after Tihar Jail authorities, where he is lodged after conviction in another case related to the riots, could not produce him on Tuesday.


    In the case before the trial court, three persons - Sajjan Kumar, Brahmanand Gupta and Ved Prakash - are facing trial on charges of murder and rioting pertaining to the killing of Surjit Singh in Delhi's Sultanpuri.


    The riots broke out after the assassination of then prime minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards on October 31, 1984.


    The witness, Cham Kaur, had on November 16 last year identified Sajjan Kumar before the court as one who had allegedly instigated the mob to kill Sikhs.


    Ms Kaur had told the court that she had seen Sajjan Kumar allegedly addressing a crowd in the national capital's Sultanpuri area in 1984.


    "On November 1, 1984 when I stepped out to look for my goat, I saw accused Sajjan Kumar addressing the crowd and saying ''hamari ma maar di, Sardaro ko maar do'' (They killed our mother, kill the Sikhs)," Ms Kaur had told the court.


    She further said the next morning, her son and father were killed.


    "My son Kapoor Singh and my father Sardarji Singh were pulled out of the hiding place on the second floor, beaten badly and thrown down from the roof," Ms Kaur had said, adding, she also received injuries in the attack.


    Before Cham Kaur, another key prosecution witness Sheela Kaur identified Kumar as one who had instigated a crowd in Sultanpuri.


    The case was transferred from the Karkardooma court to the Patiala House court by the Delhi High Court, which had directed the district judge to video record the proceedings at the cost of the accused.


    Kumar and the two other accused had said that they were ready to bear the expenses of the videography of proceedings.


    The proceedings in the case were earlier stayed after the complainant Joginder Singh approached the high court seeking transfer of the case while alleging that evidence was not being properly recorded.


    The Delhi High Court had on December 17 convicted Kumar and sentenced him to imprisonment for "remainder of his natural life" in another 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, saying the riots were a "crime against humanity" perpetrated by those who enjoyed "political patronage" and aided by an "indifferent" law enforcement agency.

    MORE India ARTICLES

    4,189 Women Deserted By NRI Husbands Given Relief In 3 Years: Centre

    4,189 Women Deserted By NRI Husbands Given Relief In 3 Years: Centre
    Minister of State for the External Affairs Ministry VK Singh told Rajya Sabha the government has adopted a "multi-pronged approach to give respite to the wives deserted by their NRI husbands".  

    4,189 Women Deserted By NRI Husbands Given Relief In 3 Years: Centre

    Punjab AAP leader H.S. Phoolka Quits Party, Says Kejriwal Didn’t Want Him To Go

    Senior advocate H.S. Phoolka on Thursday submitted his resignation from the Aam Aadmi Party to party chief Arvind Kejriwal.

    Punjab AAP leader H.S. Phoolka Quits Party, Says Kejriwal Didn’t Want Him To Go

    SEE PICS: Modi Meets Victims Of 1984 Anti-Sikh Massacre

    The victims were accompanied by the SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal, Union minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal, party MP Naresh Gujral and heads of Sikh religious bodies SGPC and DSGPC.

    SEE PICS: Modi Meets Victims Of 1984 Anti-Sikh Massacre

    Police Must Get Out Of Mindset Of Depicting Spas As Brothels: Madras High Court

    Police Must Get Out Of Mindset Of Depicting Spas As Brothels: Madras High Court
    Justice Anand Venkatesh allowed a batch of petitions and criminal original pleas from various spa and massage centres seeking quashing of FIRs and release of girls (who are therapists) lodged in government homes.

    Police Must Get Out Of Mindset Of Depicting Spas As Brothels: Madras High Court

    Consensual Sex Between Live-In Partners Not Rape, Says Indian Supreme Court

    Consensual Sex Between Live-In Partners Not Rape, Says Indian Supreme Court
    Supreme court said this while quashing an case lodged by a Maharashtra-based nurse against a doctor, who were in a live-in relationship "for quite some time".

    Consensual Sex Between Live-In Partners Not Rape, Says Indian Supreme Court

    1,605 Killed In Communal Violence Between 2004-2017, Says RTI Reply

    1,605 Killed In Communal Violence Between 2004-2017, Says RTI Reply
    The maximum number of incidents took place in 2008 when 943 cases were reported. The year witnessed most lives--167--lost to violence and 2,354 people were injured, said the year-wise data.

    1,605 Killed In Communal Violence Between 2004-2017, Says RTI Reply