Close X
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
ADVT 
Health

Fresh Blood No Better For Transfusions, Canadian-led Study Shows

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 17 Mar, 2015 02:58 PM
    TORONTO — Freshly donated blood is not better than older blood when it is transfused into severely ill patients, a new Canadian-led study reports.
     
    The findings should be a relief to Canadian Blood Services and similar agencies, which have faced calls to shorten the length of time blood can be stored before it is transfused.
     
    "When you look at all that evidence, over time it was building pressure on the blood system that fresh was better, that we need to perhaps change policy," said one of the lead authors, Dean Fergusson, a scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.
     
    Currently blood can be stored for up to 42 days, though most transfusions involve blood that is about three weeks old. But there has been a growing belief that fresher is better when it comes to transfused blood. 
     
    That's because when blood is studied under a microscope, changes are seen as it ages. The assumption has been that those changes would have an impact when older blood is transfused into people. Some animal studies and even observational studies in people have suggested that is likely true.
     
    Observational studies look at things that people do or consume to search for hints about their impacts. In this case, they would have looked at people who got blood transfusions and tried to correlate the age of the blood units with what happened to the recipients.
     
    But observational studies can't prove cause and effect. To determine if something causes something else, scientists use randomized controlled trials. And that is what Fergusson and his colleagues did.
     
    The work involved nearly 2,500 patients in intensive care units in Canada, Britain, France, the Netherlands and Belgium. The study, which was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, was published online Tuesday by the New England Journal of Medicine.
     
    ICU patients who were expected to need transfusions were randomly assigned to get fresh blood — blood that had been stored for less than eight days — or the blood that would normally be sent up from the blood bank. To minimize waste, blood banks will grab the oldest usable blood in the fridge when a transfusion order comes in.
     
    The scientists hypothesized that those who received the fresher blood would do better.
     
    But when they monitored the patients they found no real differences between the two groups. The number of deaths in the two groups were essentially the same. There were no differences between the groups in terms of the length of their hospital stays, the rates of major secondary illnesses they suffered, or other important health measures.
     
    Fergusson had previously conducted a similarly designed trial in premature infants. It too found fresh blood was not better.
     
    "I was amazed then. I thought given all the preliminary evidence and the animal evidence that we would see something.'' 
     
    He noted that American researchers reported similar findings last year in a study of cardiac surgery patients. But that study, reported at a conference, has not yet been published. 

    MORE Health ARTICLES

    Depression and ageing linked to single gene

    Depression and ageing linked to single gene
    A group of researchers from Germany and the US has found that both ageing and depression are associated with changes in a single gene....

    Depression and ageing linked to single gene

    Virus infection ups diabetes risk in kids

    Virus infection ups diabetes risk in kids
    Children who have been infected with enterovirus are around 50 percent more likely to develop Type 1 diabetes, says a study....

    Virus infection ups diabetes risk in kids

    Is Ebola the world's worst infectious disease threat since AIDS?

    Is Ebola the world's worst infectious disease threat since AIDS?
    Comparisons between the two deadly diseases surfaced in the last few months as the Ebola outbreak escalated. Both emerged from Africa and erupted into an international health crisis. And both have been a shocking reminder that mankind's battle against infectious diseases can take a sudden, terrible turn for the worse.

    Is Ebola the world's worst infectious disease threat since AIDS?

    Fatty foods may harm men more than women

    Fatty foods may harm men more than women
    Women who love fatty foods can take solace from a study that suggests gorging on high-fat meals may make men more vulnerable to diseases than women....

    Fatty foods may harm men more than women

    Learn How To Melt Stubborn 'Love Handles'

    Learn How To Melt Stubborn 'Love Handles'
    Call it love handles, the spare tyre or the middle age spread - a lot of people struggle to do away with their extra fat around waistline. Thanks to a new way to burn energy from food, you could soon be able to do so with some “stress”.

    Learn How To Melt Stubborn 'Love Handles'

    Fatty Foods May Harm Men More Than Women

    Fatty Foods May Harm Men More Than Women
    Women who love fatty foods can take solace from a study that suggests gorging on high-fat meals may make men more vulnerable to diseases than women.

    Fatty Foods May Harm Men More Than Women